Hot-runner-injection-molding-srushty

Hot Runner Injection Molding Explained: Advantages and Use Cases

Product Development

Injection molding is a fundamental process in the manufacturing industry, and it is used to produce plastic parts with high precision and efficiency. Among the different injection molding techniques, the hot runner system stands out for its unique advantages over traditional cold runner systems. In this blog, we’ll dive into the hot runner injection molding process, compare it with cold runner systems, and explore what makes it special compared to other methods.

What Is Hot Runner Injection Molding?

Hot runner injection molding involves a system where molten plastic is kept hot and fluid as it moves through a network of heated channels (called runners) directly into the mold cavities. In this process, the plastic does not solidify in the runner but is continuously kept in a molten state, allowing it to flow smoothly into the mold.

How It Differs from Cold Runner Injection Molding

The primary difference between hot runner and cold runner injection molding lies in how the plastic material is delivered to the mold:

1. Hot Runner System:

Heated Channels: The plastic is kept in a molten state within the runners, reducing material wastage.

No Sprue/Runner Waste: Because the plastic stays molten, there is no need for trimming excess material (sprue or runner) after molding, reducing post-processing time.

Faster Cycle Times: Without the need for cooling and re-heating the material, hot runner systems allow for faster production cycles.

Consistent Part Quality: Uniform temperature control ensures even filling of cavities, improving part consistency and reducing defects like sink marks or weld lines.

2. Cold Runner System:

Unheated Runners: In a cold runner system, the material is injected into unheated channels and solidifies in the runner system along with the part.

Material Waste: After each cycle, the sprue and runner need to be trimmed off and either discarded or reprocessed, leading to more waste.

Slower Cycle Times: Because the material cools down in the runner system, the cycle time is longer, especially for larger parts.

Less Complex Maintenance: Cold runner systems tend to be simpler and less expensive to maintain compared to hot runner systems, but they may not be as efficient for high-volume production.

5 Unique Advantages of Hot Runner Systems

Hot runner injection molding offers several benefits that make it distinct not only from cold runner systems but also from other injection molding techniques:

  1. Material Savings: One of the most significant advantages is the reduction of plastic waste. Since there are no solidified runners to trim, the material is utilized more efficiently, especially for high-cost resins.
  2. Higher Efficiency: With faster cycle times, hot runner systems are ideal for high-volume production. They increase throughput and reduce manufacturing time, making them suitable for industries requiring large-scale production.
  3. Improved Part Quality: Consistent temperature control in a hot runner system minimizes defects and ensures better surface finish, color consistency, and structural integrity of the parts. This is especially important in industries like automotive and electronics where precision is key.
  4. Complex Part Designs: Hot runner systems allow for more complex part designs, with multi-gate configurations that can fill larger or more intricate molds. The ability to fill the mold cavities uniformly without cooling problems opens doors to more sophisticated product designs.
  5. Reduced Labor Costs: Hot runner systems reduce post-production labor costs by eliminating the need to manually remove or reprocess sprues and runners, contributing to overall cost efficiency.

Hot runner injection molding is best suited for:

  1. High-volume production: It is a cost-effective solution for manufacturing large quantities of parts where minimizing cycle time and material waste is crucial.
  2. Precision parts: If the application requires high-quality parts with fewer surface defects and tighter tolerances, the controlled temperature and flow in hot runner systems provide the necessary consistency.
  3. Complex geometries: For parts with complex shapes, multiple gates, or intricate features, the flexibility of a hot runner system enables smooth and even filling

Hot runner injection molding offers significant advantages over traditional cold runner systems, particularly in terms of efficiency, material savings, and part quality. Its ability to reduce waste, speed up production, and handle complex part designs makes it an ideal choice for industries focused on high-volume manufacturing and precision components. While the initial setup cost and maintenance may be higher, the long-term benefits, such as reduced labor costs and improved product consistency, make it a highly efficient solution for many manufacturing needs.

 

AUTHOR

Giri prakash T

Design Engineer, Srushty Global Solutions

As a skilled Design Engineer, he specializes in translating innovative ideas into practical, manufacturable designs. With expertise in prototyping, manufacturing processes, and research and development, he creates products that seamlessly blend functionality with user-centric design. His proficiency in Design for Manufacturing (DFM) and Design for Assembly (DFA) ensures that every project not only meets market demands but is also optimized for production efficiency. Known for his meticulous attention to detail and collaborative approach, he is dedicated to driving the development of high-quality products that push the boundaries of design and technology.

Keep Reading: Know More on Design Thinking vs. User-Centered Design: Key Differences and Use Cases
injectoion mold design

A Handy Guide to Minimize Injection Plastic Mold Complexity

Contract Manufacturing

In the rapidly evolving field of plastic manufacturing, companies constantly seek ways to streamline processes and reduce costs while maintaining high quality in their products.  A well-designed part does not need mold complexity to fix poor design choices.  In this blog let’s explore the principles of minimizing plastic part mold complexity, a critical factor in achieving efficient and cost-effective production.

The Principle of Simplicity in Mold Design

Taking steps to simplify part design at the conceptual stage can significantly reduce tooling lead times and lower tooling costs.  A streamlined design minimizes moving inserts, such as side pulls and lifters, within the mold.  This speeds up the manufacturing process and reduces the potential for errors, maintenance headaches such as wear and flash, and mechanical failures.

Avoiding Undercuts and Side Pulls

Undercuts, although sometimes necessary for complex shapes, can add significant costs and complications to mold design.  They require either clever design solutions or specialized mechanisms like side pulls and lifters, the latter not only increase the tool cost but can also impact the reliability and maintenance cost of the tooling. 

Tolerances and Detail Limitations

Specifying liberal tolerances and limiting details to functional necessities can greatly influence the ease of manufacturing and the lifecycle of the mold.  Over-specifying tolerances or unnecessary details can lead to increased costs and extend the tooling lead times due to the finer precision required in tool making.  Time equals cost!

Collaborative Design Process

Engaging in a dialogue with both the molder and toolmaker during the design phase is crucial to enabling success. Discussing aspects such as the gate type, quantity and location, the parting line locations, ejector pin quantity and locations, wall thickness, ribbing, coring and tolerances can lead to a design that is more conducive to ease of manufacturability. Part design will dictate the parting line.  Steps in the parting line will increase the machining required.  While a more planar parting is desirable, it may not be possible.  Mold Flow Analysis is always recommended.  Remember that uniform wall thickness, gentle transitions, no sharp corners and avoiding concentrated mass are essential to a good part, and therefore an efficient tool design.  Ribbing is important.  Not only do ribs add stiffness to the part, but they can also aid flow and damp vibration.  But be cautious about sink marks due to concentrated mass, obey the guidelines.  This cooperation ensures that all parties understand the requirements and constraints of the project, leading to better outcomes and fewer revisions.

Standardization and Tool Material Choices

Using standardized mold frames and components whenever possible can lead to significant reductions in both cost and time.  Additionally, selecting mold materials that are aligned with the projected production volumes can optimize tool life, cost and performance.  Ordering tool steel early in the process, based on a stable part design (i.e. size and shape), can decrease overall lead time as tool steel lead times can be significant.

Post-Tooling Considerations

For covers and appearance parts, an important tip is to avoid texturing the mold until all tool corrections have been completed. Textured walls require extra draft, at least 5o, to effectively eject parts without causing damage to the texture or the part itself.  It’s essential to ensure that the base mold is correct and all tooling reworks are completed before adding such final touches.

By adhering to these principles, manufacturers can significantly simplify the injection molding process. This not only reduces costs but also enhances the reliability and efficiency of production. In an industry where every second and penny counts, optimizing mold design and manufacturing processes can provide a substantial competitive edge. The examples below demonstrate some of the design choices that can reduce complexity in mold design, ultimately leading to a more streamlined, cost-effective and successful manufacturing operation.

AUTHOR

Srushty Subject Matter Experts

Henry T. Bober

Subject Matter Expert, Srushty Global Solutions

Henry is a seasoned Mechanical Design Engineer with 40 years at Xerox Corporation, specializing in Product Development, Cost-Effective Design, and Technology Development. He holds degrees from West Virginia University and the University of Rochester and has 35 patents to his name. After retiring, he founded Fast Forward Engineering, consulting for clients like Xerox, Diebold, NCR, and Siemens Medical Products. Now a Subject Matter Expert at Srushty Global Solutions, Henry lives in Fairport, NY, with his wife Leslie and their pets. He enjoys Western-style horse riding, Japanese garden landscaping, woodworking, naval warfare history, and animal welfare advocacy.

Keep Reading: Know More on 10 Reasons Why Outsourcing PCB Assembly Services Is Beneficial for You